|
Here's an explanation of current
and possible future automotive propulsion technologies:
| Technology |
On
Market? |
Details |
| Internal
Combustion Engine: Gasoline |
Yes,
widespread |
This
is the propulsion technology most commonly found on the road today.
Emissions of smog-forming compounds has been greatly
improved by use of advanced catalytic converter technology,
careful electronic control of combustion, and other technologies.
Still, the vast majority of cars on the road today are far behind
what is possible with this technology.
Efficiency at converting
fuel to forward motion is quite low. Greenhouse gas emissions
are still a major problem. |
| Internal
Combustion Engine: Diesel |
Yes,
widespread |
Higher
energy density leads to somewhat better fuel efficiency numbers
(in terms of distance traveled per volume of fuel, all else being
equal), as compared to gasoline. This also leads to slightly lower
greenhouse gas emissions.
However, despite recent improvements, such as VW's
TDI system, diesel is still far worse in terms of smog-forming
emissions than gasoline.
Diesel is most often used
not because of clean operation, but because its efficiency can
make diesel vehicles cheaper to operate, and because of favorable
torque characteristics of diesel engines. |
| Internal
Combustion Engine: Natural Gas |
Yes,
but not widespread |
Compressed
Natural Gas (CNG), has the potential of achieving significantly
lower levels of smog-forming emissions than gasoline engines.
Currently suffers from limited range due to storage constraints.
Limited availability in many areas, though it can offer the convenience
of refueling at home. Some people are concerned about safety of
compressed natural gas. |
| Battery
Electric |
Yes,
but major manufacturers are only offering them in a few locales |
Battery
electric cars offer the advantage of very efficient operation,
in part due to the inherit efficiency of batteries and electric
motors. However, an additional efficiency advantage of any form
of electric propulsion is the possibility of regenerative braking.
Regenerative braking is made possible by operating the electric
motor as a generator to capture energy that would otherwise be
lost to heat in friction brakes. This "free" energy
can then be stored in batteries for later use.
Battery electric cars also offer the advantage of
zero tailpipe emissions (since there is no tailpipe). However,
there has been much debate as to how clean these cars actually
are. The reason for this debate centers around the fact that
it really depends on where the car is used, and whether it is
charged during peak or off-peak electricity use hours. In the
best case, if the electricity were to come from sources such
as wind or solar power, battery electrics are truly zero emission
vehicles. In many areas, battery electrics are ultimately powered
by hydro-electric, nuclear, natural gas, oil or coal sources.
In many areas, electricity
is primarily generated from sources such as hydro electric or
nuclear, which continuously produce about the same amount of
electricity. In these cases, if an electric car is charged during
off-peak hours, it may just be using surplus energy that would
otherwise have gone to waste. However, if the same car is charged
during peak electricity use hours, or even if a lot of battery
electric cars begin charging during off-peak hours, that extra
demand is supplied by sources such as natural gas, coal or oil.
The end result is that a
battery electric car may be significantly cleaner or significantly
less clean than a gasoline powered car.
Battery electric cars offer
the convenience of "refueling" at home. Battery electric
cars can be built to achieve amazing acceleration, but are often
limited in order to extend range.
Even with very lightweight
bodies and excellent aerodynamics, current battery technology
limits the range of the average electric vehicle to about 100
miles (160 km). More than anything else, this is what has limited
the public acceptance of these cars. |
| Externally
Charged Electric Hybrid |
Not
by any major manufacturer. |
Here,
we are talking about a car that has both an internal combustion
engine and a battery-powered electric motor. In this case, the
batteries can be charged by an external power source, and have
enough capacity to allow the car to run for useful distances on
electric power alone.
Such a car would offer the
advantage of battery-electric propulsion over relatively short
distances (in those regions where the electrical power generation
is such that there is a real advantage to battery electrics).
At the same time, the presence of the internal combustion engine
would allow the car to travel greater distances when needed.
The disadvantage of this
approach is that such a car requires a lot of batteries and
a large electric motor capable of powering the car alone. That,
together with the gasoline engine, would make for a car that
is both expensive and heavy. This weight would, in turn, hurt
the car's overall efficiency.
Such a car could be designed
as a serial hybrid, where the internal combustion engine is
connected to a generator, and only an electric motor directly
powers the wheels. It could also be designed as a parallel hybrid,
where both the internal combustion engine and electric motor
directly drive the wheels some or all of the time. It could
also be some other variation or combination of serial or parallel
design. |
| Charge
Sustaining Electric Hybrid |
Yes,
in the form of the Honda Insight & Toyota Prius. |
Like
an externally charged hybrid, a "charge-sustaining hybrid"
has both internal combustion and electric motors, taking advantage
of the best attributes of each. They offer the long range of (in
the case of the Insight & Prius) a gas powered car, with the
efficiency advantages possible with regenerative braking.
However in the case of a charge-sustaining hybrid,
the only external source of energy is fuel for the internal
combustion engine.
Since charge-sustaining hybrids
seldom drive far (if at all) on electric power alone, this allow
the electric motor and batteries to be relatively small, making
the vehicle more affordable, and improving efficiency by reducing
weight.
Also, since the gasoline
engine doesn't necessarily have to propel the car alone, it
too can be made smaller and more efficient. A typical gasoline-only
car has an engine that is much large than necessary for maintaining
a cruising speed, in order to provide lots of extra power for
acceleration. In a hybrid car, the gasoline engine can instead
be optimized for steady-state cruising. The resulting engine
might provide relatively poor acceleration along, but coupled
with the electric motor, the car can achieve the performance
of a gasoline-only car that has a significantly larger engine.
While different from one
another, both the Insight and Prius are somewhere between a
parallel and series hybrid.
Both the Insight and Prius
use gasoline for the internal combustion engine portion of the
hybrid powertrain. However, it would also be possible to build
a diesel-electric or natural gas-electric hybrid, with the relative
advantages and disadvantages of diesel or natural gas propulsion. |
| Hydrogen
Fuel Cell Electric |
No |
A
lot of hope is being pinned on fuel cell electric propulsion.
Fuel cell cars are anywhere from a few years to a decade or more
away, depending on who you ask.
There are at least two forms of fuel cell electric
cars that are envisioned: 1.) hydrogen fuel cells that are supplied
by an on-board tank of hydrogen, and 2.) fuel cells that have
on board reformers to extract hydrogen from gasoline or natural
gas.
The basic hydrogen fuel cell
generates electricity using hydrogen in a process that doesn't
produce any exhaust worse that water vapor. This electricity
then powers an electric motor.
There are a few problems
with using hydrogen as a fuel source, though. First of all,
its relatively low energy density means that even with a large
tank, a hydrogen fuel cell powered car would have a fairly limited
range - perhaps a couple hundred miles. This means that efficiency
in the form of lightweight body technologies and aerodynamics
would be very important for such a car.
Another problem with using
hydrogen is where that hydrogen comes from. In truth, fuel cell
technology is really just another means of storing energy. This
energy (the hydrogen) would most likely either come from reforming
fossil fuels, or from using electricity to isolate hydrogen
from the air. In the former case, this would require a new refueling
network, and still wouldn't get us away from using fossil fuels.
The later case would potentially allow for generating that hydrogen
using electricity at home, getting around the infrastructure
problems. It would still leave the same issue as battery-electric
cars, being that the ultimate cleanliness of this technology
depends on how that electricity is generated. |
| Fuel
Cell Electric with Reformer |
No |
An
alternative to fuel cell cars that carry around a tank of hydrogen,
would be cars that have their own on-board reformer to extract
hydrogen from a fuel such as gasoline. This would allow the owner
of such a car to refuel using the existing infrastructure (gas
stations). This would also provide the advantage of a greater
range, since the fuel is stored on board in the form of gasoline.
Furthermore, it would provide an incremental improvement in emissions
and efficiency over burring the gasoline in an internal combustion
engine.
Disadvantages of this form
of fuel cell car include the extra expense, bulk and complexity
of having the reformer on-board, and the fact that the car is
still dependant of fossil fuels. |
|