Honda Insight Automatic vs Manual - Page 2 - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > 1st-Generation Honda Insight Forum > Honda Insight Forum 1st-Gen Discussion

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page
Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2008, 11:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United Kingdom/USA
Posts: 536
Default

I take your points,it almost seems from what you say the IMA assist could be superfluous......maybe the CVT cars would be almost as efficient without the extra weight of the IMA/Pack system.
Also one of the main advantages of a CVT tranny is its complete control through electronics producing infinite ratio,s supposedly making for a more efficient system over four or five fixed ratios under driver control.
Granted the CVT car is 86 lbs up on the manual but studying the figures the CVT is only 4mpg less in the city where the variable ratio is be exercised but is 14 mpg down on highway where lean burn comes into play for the manual car.
It seems considering the points you raised its not doing such a bad job which is probably down to the infinite ratios and control,maybe it could be better without the hybrid system plus a lean burn

DGate
Dgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-21-2008, 12:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
joecvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somersworth, New Hampshire
Posts: 1,590
Default

Overall the IMA still helps the CVT a bit for a quicker start from a stop sign or red light but is usually not needed for much after you are rolling a bit (for the terrain I usually drive through). I think the additional torque from the electric motor would be missed at the stop sign but would not make the car un-driveable...Just a little slower...But I don't think many Insight owners are worried as much about 0-60 times anyway. I do think that it would be missed more in a manual transmission once up to speed because the battery can assist when the engine is lugging a bit from the driver not being in the correct gear for the condidtions whereas the CVT would just change the ratio.

It would have been interesting to see how close the CVT could have come to the MPG figures of the MT if everything was setup the same (the only difference being the transmission itself). I think the MT would have slightly beaten the CVT due to more drag on the transmission. But it would have been close

JoeCVT - Just your average CVT owner
__________________
2004 CVT Red Insight (purchased May 2011)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
No other mods performed yet

2003 CVT Blue Insight
Modified version of MIMA_L (with foot pedal)
Automatic warm air intake (all season)
Low Speed Auto Stop (LSAS)
ABS - IMA regen enabler (allows regen during ABS)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
Cooling fans powered by 12V Solar Panel

2001 MT Blue Insight (purchased Nov 2011)
Not registered yet
joecvt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2008, 10:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 394
Default

....bottom line is, the 5-speed has lean-burn, and a slightly higher engine compression ratio. I have done thorough tests, and when highway driving for efficiency (no racing around) my tests have shown the 5-speed gets 22 mpg better. Again, this is primarily because running in lean-burn mode is a HUGE advantage.

My LMPG is currently 88.5 and I see over 100 mpg on many of my longer freeway trips.

When driven normally (like an average chevrolet driver) I estimate the 5-speed would only have a 9 MPG advantage.
__________________
2005 Red 5 spd, color video cam w/5' monitor instead of outside mirrors, no rear wiper, tint, clear-coated & highly polished, car shows on weekends, LMPG 89.5
Billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 08:14 AM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 58
Default CVT mpg

Used to have the OEM tires. 60 mpg was a daily average for me 70 miles about 60 of that was interstate. I say was because now I have 175/65/14 tires now and get close to 52
__________________
77000+ miles
Factory Psi all around
Hybrid battery replaced 77000 miles
67 miles to work and back!
chachi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 03:56 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Northern California (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 68
Default

With my CVT insight and with stock tires I could regularly get 58-63 MPG on my 27 mile 1 way commute.

Since I don't like the way the stock tires handle/perform I decided to get Toyo hi performance tires and now get around 50-55 MPG.

I feel safer and the ride is tremendously improved.

I think the CVT model has better computerized control of the IMA's battery. Perhaps this translates into longer battery life??
__________________
'05 New Formula Red CVT , Schukra lumbar support, Toyo 195/55-14 T1-R tires, Holmgren footrest, Wayland sub
RobMason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 08:27 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United Kingdom/USA
Posts: 536
Default

RobMason Wrote:

Quote:
I think the CVT model has better computerized control of the IMA's battery
doe's t
In what way? please quantify.

DGate
Dgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 10:33 AM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
joecvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somersworth, New Hampshire
Posts: 1,590
Default

The CVT is usually able to keep the battery within one or two bars from the top (as long as your are not driving up a mountain). This is done in a couple of different ways. When you let your foot off the gas, the "gear" ratio automatically changes slightly to cause a higher rpm during regen. Plus, you are able to get regen when coming to a stop all the way down to about 5 MPH before autostop kicks in. Then you have the background charging (if needed) like in the manual, but the CVT is able to slightly adjust gearing to the amount needed to propel the car at the desired speed and background charge at the same time.

Now some of this stuff I metioned could be done by the driver in a manual model but it relies on the driver to do the manual work when coming to a stop and more shifting (when needed) during background charge.

In the CVT, it is all automatic (computerized)

JoeCVT - Just your average CVT owner
__________________
2004 CVT Red Insight (purchased May 2011)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
No other mods performed yet

2003 CVT Blue Insight
Modified version of MIMA_L (with foot pedal)
Automatic warm air intake (all season)
Low Speed Auto Stop (LSAS)
ABS - IMA regen enabler (allows regen during ABS)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
Cooling fans powered by 12V Solar Panel

2001 MT Blue Insight (purchased Nov 2011)
Not registered yet
joecvt is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2