I just purchased The 2001 Insight CVT listed on Craigslist in VA and mentioned in this forum for $1600 cash. It has a bad transmission but everything else checked out just fine. I beat the saleman down all week from $2395. I stayed firm at $1500 until he called me today and said $1600 cash off the lot. It's in my driveway now. He replaced the IMA between the motor and transmission because someone told him that was the problem, but it wasn't. The car does move but is grinding and slipping real bad in the transmission. Now the fun begins. Anyone got a 2001-2006 CVT for sale?
I'm interested to drive a CVT some day. I'm sure it would be an exercise in frustration after only driving MTs, but it would be interesting.
__________________
Insight #1 - Silver '01 5MT @ 158,388 as of 7/11 - Best Tank: 84.5MPG over 807mi
Insight #2 - Silver '01 5MT @ 450,000 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 86.0MPG over 800mi
Insight #3 - Silver '00 5MT, MIMA #163P, BCM Gauge, OBDIIC&C Gauge, BetterBattery @ 228,869 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 78.4mpg over 687mi
I'm interested to drive a CVT some day. I'm sure it would be an exercise in frustration after only driving MTs, but it would be interesting.
It is like saying congrats on your purchase but you could have done better.
It may be frustrating for some;
since the left foot will have nothing to do.
being able to hold a coffee in your hand from dead stop to highway speed.
not being told by dashboard indicator as to when to shift gears.
not having to constantly wonder if they are in the correct gear.
having IMA battery packs last longer (on average).
having a Super Ultra Low Emissions Vehicle.
Oh, now I remember, getting less MPG (on average) but yet, having the second highest MPG vehicle without having to work at it. It is not always about getting the ultimate MPG for everyone who owns an Insight, sometimes it is what you have to do to acheive the MPG.
Each vehicle has its pros and cons but they are both great designs for what they were intended for. You say tomato and I say tomato (it doesn't translate correctly as text) but I don't say that your tomato is sub-par.
JoeCVT = Just your average CVT owner
__________________
2004 CVT Red Insight (purchased May 2011)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
No other mods performed yet
2003 CVT Blue Insight
Modified version of MIMA_L (with foot pedal)
Automatic warm air intake (all season)
Low Speed Auto Stop (LSAS)
ABS - IMA regen enabler (allows regen during ABS)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
Cooling fans powered by 12V Solar Panel
2001 MT Blue Insight (purchased Nov 2011)
Not registered yet
Er.. I didn't mean it like that at all, I am sorry I was just thinking aloud...
__________________
Insight #1 - Silver '01 5MT @ 158,388 as of 7/11 - Best Tank: 84.5MPG over 807mi
Insight #2 - Silver '01 5MT @ 450,000 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 86.0MPG over 800mi
Insight #3 - Silver '00 5MT, MIMA #163P, BCM Gauge, OBDIIC&C Gauge, BetterBattery @ 228,869 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 78.4mpg over 687mi
The cvt is a bit better in design than a slush box. I like the fact it always has the right ratio vs 4 clunky gears to select.
At times it doesnt seem to really lug the engine, but seems to stick to 70% load, so its tempting to hack the controls to force a tall ratio just for that purpose unless 70% load is optinum vs WOT for mpg.
Sent from my Autoguide iPod touch app
__________________
Enginer 4 kilowatt PHEV, 3000k 35 watt fogs, Eco bulb highs, 4300k 35 watt low all w/relay kits, DRLs/Rear Wiper removed&rear interior gutted, Sony HU W/front speakers, Tanabe nf springs, 35% tint all around, all LED lamp replacement, 09 fit progress rear sway bar, OEM block heater, full gril block, KN Filter, Honda vent visiors, group 51 battery, home made balancer/grid charger Best/Worse MPG 96/36
I agree, a CVT is great compared to a slushbox. And Honda's design seems to be fairly reliable overall.
Wish I could have sat in on the meetings where they decided to not give the CVT lean burn though. It strikes me as a really odd decision.. seems much more trouble to create a different engine, etc.. but I suspect it was more of a political decision than not, ie: having a SULEV vehicle.
__________________
Insight #1 - Silver '01 5MT @ 158,388 as of 7/11 - Best Tank: 84.5MPG over 807mi
Insight #2 - Silver '01 5MT @ 450,000 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 86.0MPG over 800mi
Insight #3 - Silver '00 5MT, MIMA #163P, BCM Gauge, OBDIIC&C Gauge, BetterBattery @ 228,869 as of 1/12 - Best Tank: 78.4mpg over 687mi
That is interesting. I was reading on ecomodder that other vehicles over seas has a green indicator that signals you are in lean burn. It would seem with a cvt it would be easier than with a fixed ratio to keep the car in lean burn and tie it to an eco button or something.
Sent from my Autoguide iPod touch app
__________________
Enginer 4 kilowatt PHEV, 3000k 35 watt fogs, Eco bulb highs, 4300k 35 watt low all w/relay kits, DRLs/Rear Wiper removed&rear interior gutted, Sony HU W/front speakers, Tanabe nf springs, 35% tint all around, all LED lamp replacement, 09 fit progress rear sway bar, OEM block heater, full gril block, KN Filter, Honda vent visiors, group 51 battery, home made balancer/grid charger Best/Worse MPG 96/36
Wish I could have sat in on the meetings where they decided to not give the CVT lean burn though. It strikes me as a really odd decision.. seems much more trouble to create a different engine, etc.. but I suspect it was more of a political decision than not, ie: having a SULEV vehicle.
I agree, at times on long highway trips (I do admit ), I wish lean burn was an option for gen1 US CVT Insights. Having to build an engine with different pistons to lower the compression ratio and a different fuel line and cat converter setup between the two models seems like a waste of resources without considering the competitor's high MPG car specs. I think part (if not all) of the decision to make US model CVTs non-leanburn (SULEV certified) was to compete with the Prius (an SULEV car) on an environmental EPA rating "green" basis.
JoeCVT = Just your average CVT owner
__________________
2004 CVT Red Insight (purchased May 2011)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
No other mods performed yet
2003 CVT Blue Insight
Modified version of MIMA_L (with foot pedal)
Automatic warm air intake (all season)
Low Speed Auto Stop (LSAS)
ABS - IMA regen enabler (allows regen during ABS)
Relocated outside temp sensor near mid engine
Cooling fans powered by 12V Solar Panel
2001 MT Blue Insight (purchased Nov 2011)
Not registered yet
I'm at two but i can't see me getting a third any time soon. Congrats on the purchase!
Tim
__________________ 2000 Silver MT #168, 119k miles, Grid charger, CARD switch, rad block, MIMA #174, Hurting (aka dead) IMA battery which I'm trying to revive.
80.1 Lmpg over 14,654 miles (4/23/12)
Bests trips: One way 58.2 miles-107.3 mpground trip 116.8 miles-98.5mpgTank: 90.75mpg
2001 Blue CVT "Retired" to the girlfriend - 191k miles my Lmpg 69.3 over 21k miles
Best trip: 56.6 miles-92.3 mpg, round trip 133.6miles-84.3mpg Tank: 623.6 miles 8.30 gallons=75.13mpg 2005MT HCH winter car-52.9Lmpg
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.