Impact of 'deep' discharge prior to grid charge - Page 7 - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > 1st Generation Honda Insight Forum > Honda Insight Forum 1st-Gen Discussion

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page
Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2013, 11:23 PM   #61 (permalink)
Eli
Moderator

 
Eli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,789
Send a message via AIM to Eli Send a message via MSN to Eli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eq1 View Post
Which description of cell reversal are you referring to here when you say, "That's not what..."? What's the "that's" -- my second description or johnvirginia's (or all of them)?
Sorry, I didn't see John's post beforehand. I was referring directly to your post, "I read a post somewhere online that said you can reverse cell reversal with several shots of high current from a capacitor or something to that affect - like Mike D.'s cell zapping. I don't really buy it, but then I wouldn't really know... I thought cell zapping was more about breaking up 'nickel dendrites'...".

Quote:
I don't recall seeing a hanging positive recal at 72% as I normally get - will these happen as well during a key-on grid charge?
Yes, they will. But your pack isn't healthy enough to get from 25% to 72% before the positive recal.

A weak pack will only hang at 72% if it isn't taken below it's recal point. If charging after a recal, the positive recal will happen well before 72%.
__________________
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC - Helping your hybrid get from point A to point Bee!

Home of the MAXIMA™ performance IMA battery

US Distributor for the OBDIIC&C Gauge

503-730-8786
info@bumblebeebatteries.com
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC

Last edited by Eli; 02-16-2013 at 11:27 PM.
Eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-17-2013, 03:17 AM   #62 (permalink)
eq1
Senior Member
 
eq1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 922
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli View Post
....Yes, they will. But your pack isn't healthy enough to get from 25% to 72% before the positive recal....If charging after a [neg] recal, the positive recal will happen well before 72%.
That makes sense.
__________________
2000MT, CAN, ~168K miles
eq1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 03:26 AM   #63 (permalink)
Eli
Moderator

 
Eli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,789
Send a message via AIM to Eli Send a message via MSN to Eli
Default

Right. Thanks for the clarification.
__________________
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC - Helping your hybrid get from point A to point Bee!

Home of the MAXIMA™ performance IMA battery

US Distributor for the OBDIIC&C Gauge

503-730-8786
info@bumblebeebatteries.com
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC
Eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 03:53 AM   #64 (permalink)
eq1
Senior Member
 
eq1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 922
Default

I just meant your whole explanation makes sense (not just the little clarification)...
__________________
2000MT, CAN, ~168K miles
eq1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 04:02 AM   #65 (permalink)
eq1
Senior Member
 
eq1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 922
Default

So, I'm finishing up a grid charge as we speak. I'm running it quite a bit longer than I have before. The last two grid charges were about 4800mAh. This time I guess I'm going to take it up to about 7000mAh. My rough logic is that even the deadest cell should have the chance to get charged all the way (not that it/they will). Last two times the pack seemed to top off at about 169-170 volts. This time it seemed to sit at 167-168 for a while, but a couple hours later it was up to 171, and then an hour or so later 172V...

A couple observations:

-I mentioned this elsewhere, but the fan did not turn on automatically at 100F.
-I turned on fan, and in about 10-15 minutes it was down to about 80F. About 4 hours later it was down to about 55F (ambient at 50F). I turned the fan down to Lo and it's holding at 55F...
__________________
2000MT, CAN, ~168K miles
eq1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 07:58 AM   #66 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, VA USA
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli View Post
When current is run through a NiMH cell in reverse, hydrogen gas is rapidly evolved at the positive nickel electrode. The generation of gasses literally break the nickel matrix of the positive electrode apart, increasing internal resistance. This same mechanism(generation of gasses at the electrodes) occurs during normal cell use(charge/discharge), but on a much smaller, slower scale.

If the generation of hydrogen gas at the nickel electrode is faster than the regeneration of water at the metal hydride electrode, cell pressure will increase. If the pressure increase is enough, venting will result. This is the ultimate damage, but is unlikely to occur during low current events at least. Instead, you're just aging the cells a little more rapidly than otherwise. It's entirely possible this is an acceptable trade off, for a balanced pack?



Yes. The BCM doesn't know or care whether you're actually moving or not. It's sole job is to monitor the batteries vital statistics. If it's powered up and current is flowing into our out of the battery, it counts it, etc.

Key-on is the "crude" way to do it, though effective. A perhaps better way is to simply power the BCM with 12V from the grid charger.
Eli: Thanks for the explanation on the cell reversal. I noticed you used the word "rapidly" in "hydrogen gas is rapidly evolved at the positive nickel electrode". Is this hydrogen gas and " break the nickel matrix of the positive electrode apart" proportional to the rate of discharge (the size/watt of the light bulb used as mentioned in an earlier proposal and time thus taken to discharge the battery)?

It seems a little confusing since the car in normal use is charging and discharging at high amps (50 amps plus which is large watts?). But, I guess, the MCM/BCM keeps the whole battery/2 sticks/12cells in a voltage range (prevents discharge/assist) via the 10 voltage taps where it isn't expected that any one of the 12 cells in any monitored 2 stick pair will experience cell reversal/serious positive electrode damage. Thus, reduced overall battery capacity allowed by the BCM/MCM(and ultimately a 1449 code).

Also, you did noticed my question on key on charging was directed at a 2003 HCH (combined BCM/MCM), not an Insight, right?
JohnVirginia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 02:49 PM   #67 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
RedJellyBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 560
Default

I ran the battery down again yesterday. What I did differently was to recharge it slowly. Whereas last time I recharged it at 1050mA, I let this one go for about 15 hours at 350mA. When I got in to check the battery this morning, I saw the voltage at 177 and the battery temperature at 48 deg. F (coolant temp 25 degrees). I'll try to exercise the battery some more this coming week. It's good, though - I haven't had any IMA lights come on since I started the deep discharging thing. My car used to throw a P1449 at the top of a moderate hill if I used assist all the way up. Now, not so much.. it'll draw down the SOC from 80 to 65 and bring on a forced charge if I've driven for about a minute and a half, drawing 20 amps the whole way. Better than an IMA light.
__________________
2002 Honda Insight 5MT
280,000 miles, Bumblebee MaxIMA battery, Bumblebee OBDIIC&C gauge
RedJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 05:44 PM   #68 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hon. Hawaii
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedJellyBean View Post
I ran the battery down again yesterday. What I did differently was to recharge it slowly. Whereas last time I recharged it at 1050mA, I let this one go for about 15 hours at 350mA. When I got in to check the battery this morning, I saw the voltage at 177 and the battery temperature at 48 deg. F (coolant temp 25 degrees). I'll try to exercise the battery some more this coming week. It's good, though - I haven't had any IMA lights come on since I started the deep discharging thing. My car used to throw a P1449 at the top of a moderate hill if I used assist all the way up. Now, not so much.. it'll draw down the SOC from 80 to 65 and bring on a forced charge if I've driven for about a minute and a half, drawing 20 amps the whole way. Better than an IMA light.
Hit the word excising, 3 years I have always excise my pack 4 bars background charging, not Using full braking Regen. Daily after I can use full braking Regen. Those who call me silly are into their second pack. other forums.

It's the same as us humans, if you want to eat diet of junk fatty tasty food ( full braking Regen) you need to excise daily (slow daily charge) or you get cholesterol ( internal battery carbon build up) just before the warning sign ( recalls) and heart attack ( codes/ unbalance )

Last edited by Aqua; 02-17-2013 at 05:51 PM.
Aqua is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 09:25 PM   #69 (permalink)
Eli
Moderator

 
Eli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,789
Send a message via AIM to Eli Send a message via MSN to Eli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnVirginia View Post
Eli: Thanks for the explanation on the cell reversal. I noticed you used the word "rapidly" in "hydrogen gas is rapidly evolved at the positive nickel electrode". Is this hydrogen gas and " break the nickel matrix of the positive electrode apart" proportional to the rate of discharge (the size/watt of the light bulb used as mentioned in an earlier proposal and time thus taken to discharge the battery)?
Yes. That's why I said at low currents, venting is unlikely to occur.

Quote:
It seems a little confusing since the car in normal use is charging and discharging at high amps (50 amps plus which is large watts?).
Right, but the stresses to the internal structures of the battery are overall very small when the cells are in their most efficient SoC range, specifically because they are very efficient. Most of the energy is being absorbed, not going to creating heat and gasses. It's only at the bottom and top end of the SoC range that high currents will become a problem, which is why the car has it's 80% to 20% SoC general limits.

Quote:
But, I guess, the MCM/BCM keeps the whole battery/2 sticks/12cells in a voltage range (prevents discharge/assist) via the 10 voltage taps where it isn't expected that any one of the 12 cells in any monitored 2 stick pair will experience cell reversal/serious positive electrode damage. Thus, reduced overall battery capacity allowed by the BCM/MCM(and ultimately a 1449 code).
Pretty much. If a tap hits "low", you get a negative recal. If a tap hits "high", you get a positive recal. If the window between these two events becomes too small, you get an IMA light.

Quote:
Also, you did noticed my question on key on charging was directed at a 2003 HCH (combined BCM/MCM), not an Insight, right?
Yeah, I did. I am certain that it would work the same, though I've never tried it as I don't have an HCH (yet). In the case of an HCH, you would be powering the BCM/MCM combo IMA computer from the grid charger.
__________________
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC - Helping your hybrid get from point A to point Bee!

Home of the MAXIMA™ performance IMA battery

US Distributor for the OBDIIC&C Gauge

503-730-8786
info@bumblebeebatteries.com
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC
Eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2013, 09:28 PM   #70 (permalink)
Eli
Moderator

 
Eli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 5,789
Send a message via AIM to Eli Send a message via MSN to Eli
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eq1 View Post
So, I'm finishing up a grid charge as we speak. I'm running it quite a bit longer than I have before. The last two grid charges were about 4800mAh. This time I guess I'm going to take it up to about 7000mAh. My rough logic is that even the deadest cell should have the chance to get charged all the way (not that it/they will). Last two times the pack seemed to top off at about 169-170 volts. This time it seemed to sit at 167-168 for a while, but a couple hours later it was up to 171, and then an hour or so later 172V...

A couple observations:

-I mentioned this elsewhere, but the fan did not turn on automatically at 100F.
-I turned on fan, and in about 10-15 minutes it was down to about 80F. About 4 hours later it was down to about 55F (ambient at 50F). I turned the fan down to Lo and it's holding at 55F...
Voltages must be referenced to a temperature, unfortunately.. which is something we rarely do. It has a huge impact. I had to adjust the grid charger's voltages when winter rolled around - it was cutting back way too early.

It's possible the voltage rise you saw is only because of the temperature drop, and not because of any differences in your cells. Could be a little of both, no real way to tell I guess.
__________________
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC - Helping your hybrid get from point A to point Bee!

Home of the MAXIMA™ performance IMA battery

US Distributor for the OBDIIC&C Gauge

503-730-8786
info@bumblebeebatteries.com
Bumblebee Batteries, LLC
Eli is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2