Insight Review - Times Online - Brace yourselves... - Page 3 - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > 2nd Generation Honda Insight Forum > Honda Insight Forum 2nd-Gen Discussion

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page
Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2009, 05:03 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: St Paul Minnesota
Posts: 260
Default

OK, Let me see if I have this right. He wants the performance of a 12 cylinder sports car. The ride and quietness of a high end luxury car. And he wants 50 miles per gallon all for $20,000.00.
Brian1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-20-2009, 07:17 AM   #22 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 51
Default

I guess I'm odd because, although I love all cars, I have a special affection for cheap cars that are well designed, primarily because I can't afford a 30,000 + sports car, nor do I find them practical for everyday life.

To me, a car review should be geared toward the audience of the car. Everyone knows going in that a hybrid isn't going to be a powerhouse, and that it will have some compromises. Having compared an Insight to a Fit (and to my wife's CR-V), I see some definite weaknesses, namely the rear seat, the rear visibility, and the lack of cargo space (compared to the other two). I also think that Honda would have had a much bigger hit had they dropped the price an extra $1000.

When I read a review, I like to know what it does well and what it does not. While the Insight will never win a race, never win admiring glances from gear heads in the next lane, and never replace the mini-van, it seems like a perfect couples car and/or second or third car for commuting.
Crutnacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 08:08 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 361
Arrow

Insight Public Enemy #1 – Jeremy What's-His-Name:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 340x_Jeremy-Clarkson-Belly.jpg (43.0 KB, 75 views)
__________________
Steve Villatoro
www.stevenvillatoro.com

'09 Civic Hybrid-L w/NAV
Former hybrids: '02 Insight, '07 Camry Hybrid
Former microcars: '57 BMW Isetta, '08 smart
stevenvillatoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 05:40 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Westchester County, New York
Posts: 128
Default

Sorry to resurrect a thread, but I figured that was better than starting a new one on a topic that has already been covered.

So the consensus of the people here at this forum is that the nickel mining done to create hybrid battery packs is not as damaging to the environment as is the burning of fossil fuel (oil)? Is that true regardless of how much nickel is mined for however many hybrid battery packs are created?

I have been curious about that aspect of hybrid vehicles for a while now (is it robbing Peter to pay Paul?). (I am not a scientist, if that wasn't clear already!)

Thanks.
pjaymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 08:49 PM   #25 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 78
Default

This nickel mining issue is a red herring of the right. A regular car battery is much more of an issue. Probably most of the nickel in the battery comes from recycled sources to begin with, as according to Wikipedia:

"Most industrial nickel is recycled, due to the relatively easy retrieval of the magnetic element from scrap using electromagnets, and due to its high value."

Hybrid Battery Toxicity | Hybrid Cars for more info, where it says:

"Toyota and Honda place decals with a toll-free number on their hybrid battery packs. Toyota offers a $200 bounty to ensure that every battery comes back to the company. In a press release, Toyota states, "Every part of the battery, from the precious metals to the plastic, plates, steel case and the wiring, is recycled." Honda collects the battery and transfers it to a preferred recycler to follow their prescribed process: disassembling and sorting the materials; shredding the plastic material; recovering and processing the metal; and neutralizing the alkaline material before sending it to a landfill."
__________________
2010 EX Sky Blue since 11/2/09
insightfulone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 09:35 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Westchester County, New York
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by insightfulone View Post
This nickel mining issue is a red herring of the right. A regular car battery is much more of an issue. Probably most of the nickel in the battery comes from recycled sources to begin with, as according to Wikipedia:

"Most industrial nickel is recycled, due to the relatively easy retrieval of the magnetic element from scrap using electromagnets, and due to its high value."

Hybrid Battery Toxicity | Hybrid Cars for more info, where it says:

"Toyota and Honda place decals with a toll-free number on their hybrid battery packs. Toyota offers a $200 bounty to ensure that every battery comes back to the company. In a press release, Toyota states, "Every part of the battery, from the precious metals to the plastic, plates, steel case and the wiring, is recycled." Honda collects the battery and transfers it to a preferred recycler to follow their prescribed process: disassembling and sorting the materials; shredding the plastic material; recovering and processing the metal; and neutralizing the alkaline material before sending it to a landfill."
Thanks, insightfulone. How touching of the right to acknowledge that there is an environment at all, much less that human activities are harming it. Now, if we could only get it to acknowledge climate change, in this, the 10th hottest year on record.

That's good to know about the battery's recyclability and that Toyota and Honda place such a premium on recovering their vehicles' batteries and disposing of them properly.
pjaymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 12:49 AM   #27 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
jcbesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: TX/NY
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pjaymac View Post
Sorry to resurrect a thread, but I figured that was better than starting a new one on a topic that has already been covered.

So the consensus of the people here at this forum is that the nickel mining done to create hybrid battery packs is not as damaging to the environment as is the burning of fossil fuel (oil)? Is that true regardless of how much nickel is mined for however many hybrid battery packs are created?

I have been curious about that aspect of hybrid vehicles for a while now (is it robbing Peter to pay Paul?). (I am not a scientist, if that wasn't clear already!)

Thanks.
i'm hardly a shill for big oil, and I don't want to sound the contrarian, but consensus is not science - the warming debate is a perfect example ... the true effects of widespread battery/ev/phev auto useage will likely have downstream effects that are unanticipated at this point ... with alt auto useage in the low single digits among all cars on the road the impact at this point is minimal ... what happens when useage is comparable to conventional powertrains? ... large scale (vastly exceeding anything in use today) battery infrastructures, mining/processing/exploring for nimh/lion/rare earths etc, roads into hitherto untouched areas of the world, tailings, backwash pools, refinement factories, battery waste disposal are only some of things i can think of off the top of my head and will have profound effects on the economics of the auto industry, environment, etc. ... neither would i put too much stock in the rather rosy projections of personalities and publications which obviously have a big stake (personal, political, religious, and otherwise) in the destruction of oil/gas & adoption of green tech - there is no such thing as a free lunch in this world!
__________________
JB

2011 Insight LX - Black/Black

Last edited by jcbesq; 12-02-2011 at 02:39 AM.
jcbesq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 10:55 AM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Westchester County, New York
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbesq View Post
i'm hardly a shill for big oil, and I don't want to sound the contrarian, but consensus is not science - the warming debate is a perfect example ... the true effects of widespread battery/ev/phev auto useage will likely have downstream effects that are unanticipated at this point ... with alt auto useage in the low single digits among all cars on the road the impact at this point is minimal ... what happens when useage is comparable to conventional powertrains? ... large scale (vastly exceeding anything in use today) battery infrastructures, mining/processing/exploring for nimh/lion/rare earths etc, roads into hitherto untouched areas of the world, tailings, backwash pools, refinement factories, battery waste disposal are only some of things i can think of off the top of my head and will have profound effects on the economics of the auto industry, environment, etc. ... neither would i put too much stock in the rather rosy projections of personalities and publications which obviously have a big stake (personal, political, religious, and otherwise) in the destruction of oil/gas & adoption of green tech - there is no such thing as a free lunch in this world!
Good points all, jcbesq. I don't even know what tailings are!
pjaymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2