When I test drove the 2nd Gen I figured it was way off, since the car is about 1000lbs heavier, and driven by an engine 30% bigger than the 1st Gen, yet showing 55-60mpg on the gauge. The 1st Gen gauge is very accurate, but maybe they just used a cheap vacuum gauge on the 2nd gen or something comparably inaccurate to save money. So how inaccurate is it?
__________________
2000 silver MT 122k
121k crankshaft seal
116k new egr/cleaned spacer plate
113k p1447 pack/mcm/bcm
105k engine grounds
43k LAF sensor
|