Quote:
Originally Posted by insight1
About the forced assistance:
How about two TPS sensors working in parallel. The first one is connected to the intake body and the second one to the ECU. When you press the pedal, the first TPS responds as normal and the second TPS responds normal too. Then when you need forced assistance the first TPS stays in one position while the second TPS moves forward and sends signal to the ECU that need more power by IMA system. Did any one try it this way?
|
I'm pretty sure that assist demand determined by the ECU is not just sensed by the TPS sensor. For example, if you connect a volt meter to the TPS sensor, you will find that at low vehicle speeds, assist is used at a certain voltage. But when you get to highway speeds, you will find that at the same TPS voltage (as measured before) there will be no assist.
I believe it has to do with several sensor inputs combined like MAP and VSS and possibly the TPS as well (plus others) but those three mentioned would show the driver's intent. The ECU's logic then determines assist need and how much. Changing the TPS ouput to the ECM too extreme compared to reality would likely mess with air/fuel ratios. Also, if you search in this forum, you will find that some members that installed the TPS smoothing mod for extended lean burn experience RPM issues while shifting (MT model) and that is just a small tweak of the TPS signal. On CVT models, the TPS is used to help determine ratios and start clutch engagement.
Probably ok in a temp setup to try it. You may end up with a check engine light code if you go too extreme.
JoeCVT = Just your average CVT owner