Removing friction from steering system - Page 5 - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > 1st Generation Honda Insight Forum > Modifications and Technical Issues

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page
Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2013, 06:55 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 576
Send a message via MSN to jonnyvtec
Default Removing friction from steering system

CRX is designed and geared for non assisted rack unlike the insight, the double wishbone helps reduce effort aswell as its pivots on two balljoints rather than than having to rotated the top mount bearing that's holding the corner mass of the car.


Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App
jonnyvtec is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-01-2013, 09:33 PM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
olrowdy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. Fla
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse View Post
I thought that caster is the primary driver, but no toe-in and especially toe-out reduces self centering.
Toe out could tend to make a car feel twitchy (in straight line driving) but it's chief use in FWD cars is to reduce tire wear and in racing to increase turn in when cornering. I never heard any reference of it directly to self centering.

Here are two a good references of what the various alignment settings do.

Caster, Camber, Toe

Tire Tech Information - Alignment
__________________
2005 Insight, MT, 88K, Silver
1988 Honda CRX HF, 44/51 mpg
1963 Lotus 7 replica, 12 mpg
1962 Henny Kilowatt, 40 miles/charge @ 40 mph
http://dmr-architect.com/~locouki/
olrowdy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 02:49 AM   #43 (permalink)
Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 107
Default

I removed the EPS motor a week ago along with pulling out the green connector on the EPS control box. To keep dirt out of the EPS housing a 3mm sheet of CFRP was cut to shape and screwed on (a small bead of silicone sealant was used around the edge).

Pros:
1) 1.8 kg weight saving
2) Small electric load decrease
3) Nicer (less floaty) steering feel at speeds
4) No EPS warning light (due to pulling the connector)

Cons:
1) Significant increase in difficulty turning at very low speeds (even with high tire pressure) - makes parking more of an effort. (Advice: Trying pulling the 40amp EPS fuse to see it you are ok with the load increase before doing this mod).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg EPS Housing.jpg (14.4 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg EPS Control box.jpg (15.9 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg EPS Motor on scales.jpg (14.7 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg CFRP EPS cover on scales.jpg (15.1 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg CFRP EPS cover installed.jpg (17.8 KB, 19 views)
pascal28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 02:55 AM   #44 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Thirsk North Yorkshire UK
Posts: 5,290
Send a message via MSN to retepsnikrep
Default

That's quite radical and keen Thanks for the pics.
__________________
OBDIIC&C $50 inc software, pcb, switch and obdii plug.
IMAC&C HCH1 $50 inc software and pcb.
retepsnikrep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 07:54 PM   #45 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
olrowdy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. Fla
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pascal28 View Post
Cons:
1) Significant increase in difficulty turning at very low speeds (even with high tire pressure) - makes parking more of an effort.
My car felt like I was trying to park a loaded truck w/o the fuse! Way too heavy a feeling even with 45 psi in the tires. How Honda managed to make a 1805# car feel so heavy is a feat in itself.

The previous owner put 175/65R14 tires on the car so that might contribute to the heavy feeling too. But I've got 205s on my Lotus replica and it steers much easier.
__________________
2005 Insight, MT, 88K, Silver
1988 Honda CRX HF, 44/51 mpg
1963 Lotus 7 replica, 12 mpg
1962 Henny Kilowatt, 40 miles/charge @ 40 mph
http://dmr-architect.com/~locouki/
olrowdy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 08:31 AM   #46 (permalink)
Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 2,195
Default

I don't think the steering feels heavy at all. In fact with parking I stopped noticing the extra steering effort when parking when I pulled my EPS fuse. I really don't think that power steering is needed with this car, it's there because it is expected and I'm sure someone who is particularly weak, has the wrong tires, low pressure, or has an RSI injury like carpel tunnel would want to keep it. In general I've kept mine but 1.8kg is 4 pounds and that's something to remove, especially when I am converting one of mine to electric when I want as many parasitic loads and weight removed from the car and could probably find a use for that space too. I might just do this.
__________________
2000 MT Insight "Silver Sipper"
2000 MT Insight Silver "Clone"
MN Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 05:29 PM   #47 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: midcoast Maine
Posts: 101
Default

I'm currently trying to figure out where the stiffness in the steering is coming from on one of my gen I Insights-the one I use in winter and is exposed to road salt. Today I did just a preliminary test jacking up the front wheels and moving them left and right by hand, with the steering wheel, then repeating the test with the engine and PS running. Just a little easier with the PS running. I'm guessing that I will really need to uncouple each wheel from the steering rack to find the source of the trouble-tie rod end, upper or lower strut pivots, or the rack itself. Any suggestions?
tadpole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 07:17 PM   #48 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
olrowdy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. Fla
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole View Post
I'm currently trying to figure out where the stiffness in the steering is coming from on one of my gen I Insights-the one I use in winter and is exposed to road salt. Today I did just a preliminary test jacking up the front wheels and moving them left and right by hand, with the steering wheel, then repeating the test with the engine and PS running. Just a little easier with the PS running.

The EPS torque sensor shouldn't normally see much steering resistance with the wheels in the air and wouldn't try to help in that case. And if you didn't feel much steering effort change with the motor running then I would also guess that you really don't have much steering resistance from tight parts.

I'm guessing that I will really need to uncouple each wheel from the steering rack to find the source of the trouble-tie rod end, upper or lower strut pivots, or the rack itself. Any suggestions?
Before you go to the trouble of disconnecting things read my post #32 in this thread.

Review of that post:
I pulled the EPS fuse and drove the car to get used to how it feels without the EPS working. I especially tried to get a feel for what it felt like when making small steering corrections while traveling straight down the road at 45-50 mph (when I notice the most "stickiness" with the EPS working).

When I stopped and plugged the fuse back in and tried the same small corrections I felt the steering effort before the EPS starts assisting was the same as with the fuse removed for that small steering wheel movement. It's only not assisting a few degrees of steering wheel movement with the EPS available and it is a very noticeable heavy feeling. Hence the "sticky" feeling. Once you start thinking about it the affect can be very annoying.

With my CRX (a very light steering effort car) you make corrections without really thinking about it. With the Insight you have to make a definite movement to get small corrections. And I notice that I am zig-zagging down the road.
__________________
2005 Insight, MT, 88K, Silver
1988 Honda CRX HF, 44/51 mpg
1963 Lotus 7 replica, 12 mpg
1962 Henny Kilowatt, 40 miles/charge @ 40 mph
http://dmr-architect.com/~locouki/
olrowdy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2