Ulev 5spd vs Sulev CVT. - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > 1st-Generation Honda Insight Forum > Modifications and Technical Issues

Please Visit our Site Sponsors Page
Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-25-2005, 06:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 295
Default Ulev 5spd vs Sulev CVT.

Ok this is maybe a stupid question but I am going for it:

Why is there an emissions level difference between a CVT and a 5 spd ?
Does the CVT has leanburn or not ?
What is the exact difference between the 2 engines without
the cvt or 5 spd gearboxes. I don't have a clue.
I know that leanburn exhaust gasses are more "dirty" compared to non-leanburners due to the fact that the combustion is not optimal compared to non leanburners.
In this http://www.insightcentral.net/KB/faq-cvt.html#Chart part I see that the engine compression ratios are 10.8 to 1 (5spd) and 10.3 to 1 (CVT). I tought that for a leanburn engine, the ratio is about 22 to 1.
So as I have to say: What is it ?
__________________
Greetz Windmill

2000 Insight, 5 spd, Silverstone Metallic #28.
windmill is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-25-2005, 07:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,442
Send a message via AIM to Rick
Default

Your right on that, the CVT is geared more towards emissions, the 5 speed towards mileage. I think the difference in the compression ratio is in the head. No lean burn on the US CVT that's for sure; however, if you look on the Japanese Honda site (using a translating program) they show both of theirs as 10.8:1 with both transmissions so in theory they have lean burn CVT's, and *maybe* if someone imported a Japanese ECM you could have a lean burn CVT here. I've looked at a couple CVT Insight's and they still have the NOX catylst there, which is primarily to hold back the NOX emissions while in lean burn. Not sure what you guys get in the europe market.

Still, those who have had emissions tests all I can remember hearing about blew in sub SULEV levels.
__________________
Later, Ricky
02 Red Insight - Sold
06 Silver Civic Hybrid
92 Saturn SC2 Electric, Arizona Alt fuel plate "ZEROGAS"
Rick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2005, 11:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 984
Default

According to the service manual, for the 2005 car there are the following differences between the M/T and CVT versions. This is just in the specifications, which doesn't say anything about a different intake manifold, for example, or a different engine control computer code version. That you would have to find out by looking at the part numbers, checking it by comparing the actual parts.

Anyway, according to the service manual, the following are different:
- compression ratio (M/T: 10.8, CVT: 10.3)
- brake pad size
- radiator size
- battery size

There is also an additional oxygen sensor in the M/T cars. There may be a difference in the brake fluid pressure sensing system. Maybe a few other things like cam timing.

Note that the differences in some of these specs is tiny, and really only matter in a high production volume car. It's common, for example, to use slightly different brake pads between similar models of a car, and then have a single repair part that is shared between models. All that proves is how highly tuned the car manufacturing business is...
Dougie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 07:51 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 295
Default

Is it not so that lean burn ratio is about 22 to 1 ? So 10.8 to 1 is normal " burn" .
In Europe we do only have the 5 spd ---->lean burn. In the Uk I think it is the same.
So actually the CVT is a non-vtec-e, because leanburn (5spd) requires a vtec-e. This must be difference is it ?
__________________
Greetz Windmill

2000 Insight, 5 spd, Silverstone Metallic #28.
windmill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 09:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 89
Default

Windmill:

I may be wrong, but it sounds like you are mixing up compression ratio with the air to fuel ratio.

Our Insights have a compression ratio somewhere around 10.8:1, the manual transmission cars are a little higher and have lean burn. The CVT compression ratio is 10.3:1, and for most, no lean burn.

The manual transmission engines air to fuel ratio will vary from 14.7:1 all the way to 25:1 (which would be extreme lean burn).

Now for the part I'm not sure about: Most CVT Insights do not have lean burn capabilities. I have heard on this forum that the Japanese CVT's do lean burn.

In any case the lean burn engines are not as environmentally clean as the CVT engines.
Lean burn = hotter combustion temperatures = more nitrous oxides.

Regards,
__________________
Don Church
'05 Insight 5-speed
hawkGT647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 10:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 295
Default

Yes hawkGT647, I mixed it up ! Now I understand, sorry.
I didn't know that air to fuel ratio will vary from 14.7:1 all the way to 25:1.
I tought it was a fixed ratio. And yes lean burners are more poluting.
The only question that will remain is why does Honda made the CVT's non lean burn ? Both engines output performance are almost the same, even the high Californian emission standards are ok for the lean-burners so why Honda didn't ?. Is the CVT so much more "work" for the Insight's little engine ?
Mmmm I am gonna take a look in the maintenance manual or I can Find something difference in the engine's head.
__________________
Greetz Windmill

2000 Insight, 5 spd, Silverstone Metallic #28.
windmill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 01:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 984
Default

The CVT is probably made as a SULEV car because there is a goal at Honda to have low emissions. It's not all about fuel economy...
Dougie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 04:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougie
The CVT is probably made as a SULEV car because there is a goal at Honda to have low emissions. It's not all about fuel economy...
That's true.
__________________
Greetz Windmill

2000 Insight, 5 spd, Silverstone Metallic #28.
windmill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2005, 10:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,240
Default

Not probably, that is exactly why Honda did it.
Resist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2005, 11:47 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8
Default

I have a Japanese import 2000 cvt Insight and It does not apear to have lean burn.

Cheers
Steve
BLUEBUG is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2