EU fuel consumption figures inflated by manufacturers - Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum
 
Go Back   Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum > Hybrid and Alternative Fuel Forum > General News Discussion

Insightcentral.net is the premier Honda Insight Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2013, 11:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
and two dogs
 
UK_MJN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK Shropshire
Posts: 319
Default EU fuel consumption figures inflated by manufacturers

Campaign group Transport & Environment says carmakers exploit loopholes in EU law to achieve favourable but unrealistic miles/gallon results.

They suggest the official fuel consumption cited by car manufacturers is on average almost 25% lower than that achieved in reality, and in some cases 50% lower.

The EU commission's consultants believe that 30% to 50% of the drop in claimed CO2 emissions between 2002 and 2010 "does not result from technology".

Article is here

Full report is here

Interestingly,the tricks manufacturers use are listed as including:
- disconnecting the alternator
- overinflating tyres
- taping over gaps in the bodywork and sealing the radiator grille
- using special low friction lubricants
- wheel alignment to minimze rolling resistance
- testing at altitude (low air resistance)
- using higher gears
- testing at unrealistically high temperatures
- using super slippery test track surfaces
- using a rolling road and misprogramming it for a lighter car
- Moving brake pads away from disks (not braking during the test)
- Deliberatedly under-reporting CO2 results by 4%
- Deliberatedly exploiting the testing tolerances (under speed, longer stops)

Also worth pointing out that the manufacturers do not make their raw data public either...

The upshort appears to be that much, perhaps most, of the improvement in EU car fuel economy and emissions over recent years is fictional, and that current models probably perform very little better than their (often smaller, lighter) predecessors!
__________________
Marian & Per
Citrus 2000 MT UK spec 201k miles VIN#000032
Michelin Energy Saver plus, OBDC&C, rebuilt gearbox with new bearings, lots of dog hair. Best 103 miles @ 122 mpg cold start

Last edited by UK_MJN; 03-14-2013 at 11:23 AM.
UK_MJN is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-15-2013, 08:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Uriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 943
Default

I think the discrepancy has less to do with car makers fiddling the tests and more to do with the test being hopelessly unrepresentative of real-world driving.

Have you seen the NEDC test cycle?



That's done on a rolling road, in a lab at a 20-30C starting temperature - and hybrids can start with a full SOC. No lights, heater, aircon etc.

Edit: IMO the best way to tax CO2 is not via a test cycle like this. They should reduce or abolish VED and stick the tax on fuel.
__________________
2010 Honda Insight ES 1.3 IMA (UK)

Last edited by Uriel; 03-15-2013 at 08:19 PM.
Uriel is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-15-2013, 09:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,983
Default

Hard to believe this would happen in another country than the USA.

Yeah, Ive said from my own use of a prius how its larger battery at a full soc can easily ace those tests where as the Honda its harder to do so.



Cobb is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-16-2013, 03:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Uriel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 943
Default Re: EU fuel consumption figures inflated by manufacturers

Every model of Insight 2 pretty much aced the NEDC. They all got 60+ mpgUK on the urban cycle, which, as you can see from the graph, is repeated stop and go.

In mpgUS, that's around 10mpgUS over the EPA urban rating.

I see the EPA ratings as achievable for most drivers, given a bit of concentration. NEDC is pretty much useless for anything apart from comparing numbers from different cars.

Another reason for NEDC bring unrealistic is it has no constant velocity testing at speed. You only go above 70mph very briefly during the test. This has led to many small engined diesels getting much worse numbers than their NEDC extra urban on a motorway trip. Larger engined diesels would tend to pull in some great numbers on the motorway, relatively untroubled by hills and speed.

Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App
__________________
2010 Honda Insight ES 1.3 IMA (UK)

Last edited by Uriel; 03-16-2013 at 03:36 AM.
Uriel is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-16-2013, 05:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 821
Default Mpg

I read that the fuel consumption is not actually measured directly in the test, the exhaust emmissions are measured and the fuel consumption "estimated" from those measurements.
__________________
London UK.
E27006 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 03-16-2013, 07:32 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 642
Send a message via MSN to jonnyvtec
Default

Its on a rolling road aswell with declared CdA values for the car aswell as other parameters. The car doesnt move and hence the comments about taping the gaps is just ridiculous untruths.

The tests are completed by an independant laboratory with a computer controlled 'throttle' robot
jonnyvtec is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-16-2013, 01:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
markocosic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 60
Default

Some also program the ECUs to recognise when they're driving an EU test cycle and when they're not. (dual fuel/ignition tables - one for on test and one for real world) Also used to cheat drive-by noise and so forth.
markocosic is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-19-2013, 07:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
and two dogs
 
UK_MJN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK Shropshire
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markocosic View Post
Some also program the ECUs to recognise when they're driving an EU test cycle and when they're not
Good grief - that's plain unethical.

It's clear that the public are getting very sceptical about big MPG claims. When we're asked about the car, we've had to *show* some people the dash display and point at the "86.1" (or whatever) to underline that this car actually does what we say it does!
__________________
Marian & Per
Citrus 2000 MT UK spec 201k miles VIN#000032
Michelin Energy Saver plus, OBDC&C, rebuilt gearbox with new bearings, lots of dog hair. Best 103 miles @ 122 mpg cold start
UK_MJN is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-19-2013, 07:34 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
markocosic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 60
Default

There is also no requirement for trip computers or speedometers to be accurate.

Speedos are allowed to display (100%) to (110% + 6.25 mph) of your actual speed.

Most high end cars display your actual speed if the tyres are unworn, less 2 mph. Cheap cars (and the 'bubble' shaped nissan micra is the worst for this) show 110% plus 6.25 mph.

An indicated 70 mph is actually only 58 mph and an indicated 60 mph is actually only 49 mph - this is part of the reason that there are lots of outraged grandmas cruising in the inside lane of motorways and causing a danger to other road users at "60 mph" (49 mph) in their miserable little cars whilst tut-tutting at these outrageously fast lorries.

Roadworks too. The average speed through a 50 mph roadworks (as measured by the police averaging cameras) is just 40 mph. Why? These muppets driving miserable little cars with speedos that lie. If you drive at an actual 50 mph, (nevermind 55 mph!) you *fly* past all the traffic.

Ditto driving at an *actual* 80 mph (which would be an indicated 95 mph in a late 90s Nissan Micra if it ever got there...) it's rare to be passed unless you're on the M40 or M50.

Where am I going with this? Your odometer lies too. Says you've gone further than you actually have. So the trip computer lies to the customer. Deliberately.

Fuel pumps at the forecourt also have a tolerance that's non-trivial, and you can bet your bottom dollar that they'll be set to favour the forecourt.

You know what the core problem is though? People who buy new cars either:
-are simly too stupid to do the sums on fuel economy (only about 20% of the population is numerate remember)
-can do the sums on fuel economy and give absolutely not one hoot because depreciation, insurance cost, or company vehicle taxation dominate the operating cost of a nearly new vehicle (you'd need 5/litre to change this)

But yes. Unethical. Can't say I shed too many tears for the type of moron who buys a brand new little french diesel car 'because it is cheap to run' - they're clearly quite well off and would save more money running a 10 year old 1.6 focus into the ground. Fool Money. Easily parted.
markocosic is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-19-2013, 08:15 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
samwichse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: 1st Floor, Palakkad Town 678 001, Kerala
Posts: 3,997
Default

The EU law needs to get some teeth like the EPA has.

Hyundai tried that BS gaming the system and was forced to issue a refund in extra fuel costs to its buyers.

https://hyundaimpginfo.com/resources...program-facts/
__________________
2004 Honda Civic Hybrid "Eeyore" @ 49 mpg
-MaxIMA, OBDIIC&C, IMAC&C, Lower grill block

RIP 2000 Insight, 40k miles @ 69.2 mpg
2000 Insight, AKA "The Basket Case" or "The Go Pod" @185k miles @ 63.5 mpg
-IMAC&C, OBDIIC&C, Scott's aero panel, grid charger, cheapo sound system
samwichse is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Insight Central: Honda Insight Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.