Honda Insight Forum banner

35 MPG

7K views 24 replies 16 participants last post by  Insightful Trekker 
#1 ·
Yep. I'm getting 35mpg in the city. I must clarify: I'm getting 60+mpg on the highway, and 58+mpg driving around nice flat Palo Alto. But when I get home to San Francisco? 35mpg. The hills and the stop signs/lights at every corner are killing my fuel efficiency. And while I'd certainly expect it to take it hit in those conditions, I must point out I was getting 29 mpg in my del Sol, so the Insight's doing only marginally better. In this city, the hybrid system basically seems mostly ineffective.

One thing I notice that drives me nuts is that in SF, regenerative braking is pretty much useless. The car uses plenty of assist going uphill, as it should. But it regains little to no charge on the downhill. I coast downhill with my foot on the brake just light enough to show a full charge meter. But at the slightest bump in the road (a patched pothole, for example,) the regenerative braking just quits, the car surges forward, and I lose all that potential energy from the downhill. It's really pretty annoying, frankly.

I'm driving a new 2006 M/T Insight with 3300 miles on it. (Yes, a manual in SF. And I wouldn't have it any other way. :) ) Has anyone noticed similar behavior with the regen braking? Does anyone have any tips for increasing the mileage in the San Francisco hills? Or for any other city with a stop light at every corner? I'm really loving the Insight in all other respects...
 
See less See more
#2 ·
Hi Yatdave; It's all driver technique. First suggestion: leave 5 minutes earlier, and plan on driving just a bit slower. With that in mind, you should be able to get 52+ mpg in your situation, if you try these tips:

Inflate tires to maximum pressure (44 psi or more) Speed up gently just prior to the next hill. While ascending, allow the car to slow down, and try NOT to use any assist, or very little (keep the bars showing close to fully charged) Have patience and crest the hill at a slower speed that normal. On descent, if the hill is steep and short, just keep it in 2nd gear and let compression slow you. Try to minimize the use of brakes. Look way ahead to the next stop light and get OFF the gas pedal when it turns yellow. Always look for chances to save monentum.

If descending a long hill, use the FAS technique described in other threads. (shut the engine off) So bottom line is, try not to use electric assist or brakes, and slow down a little. Practice, practice.......
 
#4 ·
Thanks for the responses.

I still need to try inflating my tires more. Thanks for the reminder.

I do try accelerating before the base of the hill when possible. But during the morning commute - and most other times, for that matter - a good segment of the driving is stop-and-go on the hill. There's a line of cars stopped at the stop sign at the top of the hill and you just have to inch your way up, car length by car length. So I'm starting from a dead stop while I'm already on the hill. <sigh>

As for regaining that energy on the short steep downhills, I'll try going down in 2nd and see how much the compression slows me. With these hills, though, I'm hoping it will be enough. I'll try tonight and see.
 
#5 ·
I suspect that the regen quitting when you hit a bump is the same kind of issue others (including me) have with the ABS being very sensitive so that the brakes "jump" when you hit a pothole. The other question is "how fast are you going when this occurs?" I believe that the regen will quit below a certain speed. That might be a good time to push in the clutch and see if you get autostop since you aren't getting any regen any more.

One more simple question - what is the climate control set on? If the a/c compressor is running (Auto, Econ with A/C, defrost) you are going to take a bit hit on mileage.

Good luck.

Jim

P.S. - I had a 70 mpg tank going (very good for me), but today it hit 99 deg. F and I had to run the a/c. Plus, it went to the shop for the state inspection and that always lowers the mileage.
 
#6 ·
I believe it is normal to lose regen while braking when hitting small bumps or uneven road surfaces. Mine does this all the time regardless of speed. I use the regen (just touching brake pedal) more to help slow down than to charge batteries. My CVT SOC has never been down more than 3 bars and is mostly either fully charged or 1 bar down. The reason you lose regen while braking over bumps, seems to be similar to why the ABS "chatters" when hitting bumps.
 
#8 ·
I first must say I am sorry to hear you have so much stop and go traffic on hills... that is always a bear...

Agree with other posts about trying to reduce speed .....use less assist.... econ AC ... Don't race accelerate to the next red light and stoped cars you see ahead of you .... drive at or bellow the poste3d speed limit .... etc...etc... but in your situation getting past 50MPG in the city will be hard....

If you are not getting AutoStop regularly when doing the stop and go up the hill it woudl be very worth while to install a FAS.

I would still say though the way I look at the Insight is improvement over other cars.... While I have my doubts that the de sol was getting 29MPG in the stop and go traffic ... more likely this was the average over the whole gas tank of driving which will include the highway, and it would be lucky to get 20 MPG under the same driveing conditions the insight gets 35 in .... but even if you got 30 MPG in the de sol and only 35 in the Insight that is only 5 MPG ... but it is a 15% improvement.... that is one of the hardest things about FE improvement at the lower end.... it might take allot to get that SUV from 15 to 20 MPG and most people would not think that 5mpg improvement is much at all but it is a 30% improvement in FE... The other problem is that in stop and go traffic on hills like that you will never get to the highway cruising MPG .... The whole way Hybrids work is to undersize the ICE for better FE as you only need the power for acceleration and then it is wasted... so in Hybrids you use the Electric motor to help with acceleration.... if you never get to the point where you can take advantage of the efficiency of the smaller ICE of the Hybrid and always trying to use the hard acceleration .... you will have a hard time seeing large MPG.

Best of luck.... I would hate that driving myself.
 
#10 ·
Yatdave, you're my alterego. I googled specifically looking for anyone else with my car, driving in San Francisco, who can't exceed mpg in the mid-30s. This is so frustrating. My overall driving, since most of it is spent in SF, is mid-40s. True, for the past 4 1/2 years with my 2002 Insight I've been fighting some bad Type A driving habits. But I've been way more B than A for quite awhile now. All of the posts since yours have been from non-SF drivers so I wonder whether they have an accurate sense of the steepness of our hills and their very inevitability (which I do love, by the way). In any event, it was comforting to know I'm not alone in my Insight's mpg deficiencies. Thank you.
 
#11 ·
Although I don't live in SF anymore, I do know exactly what you guys are going through. Unfortunately, city driving will almost always kill your mpg - no matter what car you're driving.

I will go out on a limb here and say that the Prius would definitely outshine the Insight in a city like SF, mainly because of the fact that it relies more on the battery during those types of conditions (stop and go traffic, multiple traffic signals, etc.).
 
#14 ·
It's possible that you're still driving too aggressively. What kills the MPG in city driving is the heat going into the tires when there is any force on them, either from accelerating or slowing down. So to get good mileage you have to accelerate VERY gently. Grandma-like. Slower than slowly. Irritatingly slowly.

As an experiment, why not try a couple of 20 mile segments where you take your driving habits to the very extreme. Drive one using absolutely the slowest possible acceleration. Drive one with the selector in S all the time. Drive one with the A/C off. And any other experiment you can think of. It only takes a pretty short trip to see whether any improvement is being made.

I'm particularly suspecting that the "drive in S all the time" might help, but I can't get anybody with a CVT to try it for me!
 
#15 ·
I don't know what "drive in S all the time" means. Is that an automatic-transmission thing? Mine's a stick. I just got 4 new tires so I will try your 20-mile Grandma-type driving experiment to see if it makes a difference, though I will regret even temporarily joining the ranks of those SF drivers who've so pissed me off in the past when I've just been trying to go about my business. Thanks, all.
 
#16 ·
... Is that an automatic-transmission thing?
... I will try your 20-mile Grandma-type driving experiment to see if it makes a difference,
Cindy;

It is an automitic-transmission (i.e., CVT) "thing."

As for "Grandma-type driving", odds are it will make some difference for you (safety aside), however, as one who has been to "SF" if you really want to see that MPG go up, take the car on a twenty five or fifty mile run - on a straight and relatively level highway - and run along at forty five to fifty MPH, then you'll what these Insights can really do for you MPG wise.

Frankly, I think you live in a "bad" area as far as using an Insight goes; all those hills and the stop and go traffic - it's got to be "killing" your MPG.

Hope this helps.

Fred
 
#18 ·
... I wouldn't trade anything for the Insight's engine shutdown at stops. Knowing I'm not idling is a big plus for my enviro side.
I agree. Have had my CVT since late March and am still amazed at that particular feature, among others offered by the little car; i.e., MPG guage etc. I for one think that's just so darn neat!

I could be wrong but I understand that the Prius is the ONLY other car which has such a simular feature but then I could be wrong.

Fred
 
#20 ·
Well, I live in San Francisco, but seem to have to opposite problem you have. I'm reasonably satisfied with my city mileage (seems like mid-to-high 40s), but a little disappointed in my highway mileage (low-to-mid 50s).

The city mileage can probably be explained by the fact that I live in SOMA (flat part of town, for non SFers).

Yatdave, since you say 60+ MPG on highway and also mention Palo Alto, I wonder what highway? I work in Palo Alto, and commute by 101->380->280. Today I reset the segment meter in the middle of 101, and actually was looking at 60 MPG for a while. But then I got onto 280, my battery drained (or "recal"ed) after a few hills, and I ended up with 53 MPG by the time I got to work in Palo Alto. Though I've only had the (used) car for a week, 53 is about my lifetime average, which has mostly been highway driving (1.5 trips to Sacramento, and 3.5 trips to Palo Alto).

If you do anything special to get the 60+ highway MPG (other than driving below the speed limit, which I don't want to do), I would love to hear any suggestions.

Thanks.
 
#21 ·
Well, I live in San Francisco,... work in Palo Alto, and commute by 101->380->280. ... was looking at 60 MPG for a while. But then I got onto 280, my battery drained (or "recal"ed) after a few hills, and I ended up with 53 MPG by the time I got to work in Palo Alto. Though I've only had the (used) car for a week, 53 is about my lifetime average, which has mostly been highway driving (1.5 trips to Sacramento, and 3.5 trips to Palo Alto).
You don't say if you've a CVT or a manual transmission (MT). I find that, even staying at the speed limit and/or moving with traffic, i.e., 65-70 mph, I can usually get around 70 mpg in my MT on 101 between Mountain View and SF or between Mountain View and Lincoln (north of Sacramento).

280 is worse for mpg the few times I've taken it. Much hillier, and much faster traffic, too; both hurt mpg. And 280 is indeed a battery-drainer.

40 MPG in SF doesn't sound too bad, even in SOMA. I was up there a couple times in the last couple weeks shooting some pickups on location (capturing additional scenes for a film, not putting bullets through light trucks) so I was doing lots of hill-climbing (with 4-way stupidstops at most intersections, too) and barely getting in-town mileage in the mid- to high-30s.

If yours is a CVT then an overall mpg in the mid-50s, including the in-city stuff at the end of the commute and staying even with local highway traffic (Death Race 2006), doesn't sound abnormally low. But you've only had the car for a week; as you develop your mad Insight skillz (pump up the tires, stay on 101, work with momentum instead of fighting it, take slower roads when possible) you'll see your MPG go up.
 
#22 ·
I should have said, I have a 5-speed manual Insight. Today coming home I actually got 57 MPG. Was very bad until I got on 101, where traffic was fairly slow and so brought up my MPG.

Then I reset the segment meter and was driving in san Francisco, getting mid 40s, when I went over some steep hills and dropped down to low 30s.

After reading more posts here, I'm beginning to suspect my highway mileage may be bad because of the tires. The dealer told me nothing had been customized about the car, but my tires say "Federal Super Steel 715 165/65R14 7ST". Does anyone know what the markings on the factory tires should be? I wonder if I just got higher rolling-resistance tires.

I've also noticed that my spedometer significantly overcounts MPH by about 3% (compared to a GPS unit that matches the spedometer in other cars). This also suggests that my tires aren't the default tires, and that the MPG readings I'm getting are slightly inflated.
 
#24 ·
Cool, thanks. This morning I checked my tire pressure on cold tires, and found 25 PSI on three tires. (Didn't check one of the rear tires.)

I know I'm supposed to have 38 front and 35 rear, but the tires I have say max pressure 36 PSI, so I don't think I'll do that (particularly given that it can get kind of hot during the day in California, which I'm guessing would boost my tire pressure further).

I suppose I should figure out what the max *safe* PSI is for the tires I have, since I might as well try inflating those before buying a new set of tires. Surprisingly, either I'm missing something or tire manufacturers don't seem to have a good web presence. Searching google for "Federal Super Steel 715" doesn't turn up anything relevant, and while I've found some web pages for federal tires, they don't list anything about a 715 model. Anyone know how to determine the mamimum safe inflation pressure for a tire?

Second question I guess is what to get if I replace the tires with higher PSI models. I've already seen quite a bit of discussion here and opinions/experiences seem to differ widely, so I'd be particularly interested to hear tire recommendations from people driving in the San Francisco bay area.

Thanks.
 
#25 ·
See:

Tire Comparison Test
http://www.insightcentral.net/forum/vie ... 38&start=0

for a real world test.

In general you will give up a softer ride and a somewhat less "grippier" feel for maximim MPG. AFAIK the OEM Bridgestone is peerless in regard to maximum MPG as it applies to street legal tires and the Insight.

IIRC there has only been one other post re some Michelin LRR (low rolling resistance) tires that were a better ( :?: ) compromise of ride quality and smaller MPG loss.

Anybody got that link :?:

First I'd pump up the Firestones to their maximum safe rating (35 psi) and see what improvement is available.

HTH! :)
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top