Honda Insight Forum banner

Better battery cooling.

18428 Views 90 Replies 32 Participants Last post by  Sigma Projects
Ok, Arizona summer's here and it's reaking havoc on my poor batteries. I've been keeping the car as cool as I can stand to keep it, but while it's sitting there it get hot again. A windshield cover and car cover have helped some, but still haven't prevented the car in to going in to thermal cut back several times already. So I've had a few ideas which might help some. The question is does anyone know the specifics on the battery cooling fan? I looked at it once and noticed it was a panaflo fan, but can't remember if it was a 120 mm size fan or what and also is it the low or high rpm model. If it is the quiet one I'm thinking replacing it with the faster one would help some potentially.

Any thoughts?
81 - 91 of 91 Posts
Has anyone removed the duct behind the passenger seat and let the space beteewn the Ima case and panel behind the seat act as a plenum? Seems like this may allow for more airflow.
When I get mine back I'm going to put an extra 12v fan in there and I'm going to cut a hole in the aluminum IMA compartment case and stick another fan on that hole as well. I might have them in parallel with the stock IMA fan, or I might have them wired up to a thermometer+relay device I got on ebay. After that the only thing I'll need is a decent IMA battery.
Wow that is a cool set up can you share some details of the components you used and some pics of of what is going on under the dash to get the liquid cooled by the evaporator.
are you water cooling your batteries?
That's some clever s**t right there... :)

I've considered trying to fashion a duct with its inlet up and to the right of the passenger's shoulder - trying to "lob" the A/C air into it...
Are you really charging your (stock?) pack at around 60 amps, close to 190V? Isn't that bad for the cells?
Are you really charging your (stock?) pack at around 60 amps, close to 190V? Isn't that bad for the cells?
At sustained levels without supplemental cooling and done on a routine basis, yeah, it's potentially bad, but it's still basically ~11kW limited.

For the purposes of demonstrating the effectiveness of a cooling system, I think it's a worthwhile exercise. It's not like these cells are fragile flowers. In my experience it's accumulated abuse or chronic adverse conditions that take them out.

What I would like to see is the exercise repeated -

charge/discharge/charge.
Pull over and cut the cooling system for 5 minutes.
See what the soak temperature is. :)

That would be a really good indicator of the effectiveness of the cooling system - how much of the temperature is a function of the sensors being on the surface of the cell vs. the core temperature of the cell.

If the battery temp is a pants-s****ing 140°F after 5 minutes - probably a really bad idea to stress the pack like that and not as effective as the initial data suggests - not because of the ineffectiveness of the cooling system, but the challenges of cooling big, fat cylinders and their s****y, s****y aerodynamics...
See less See more
On the subject of pack cooling...

In the Insight battery space, would it be better for pack performance and longevity to have cells packed closely so each cell is more likely to be the same temperature, or packed with space for presumably more air flow between cells, better cooling, yet perhaps risk having cells at more varied temps?

I guess the assumptions are that close-packed cells will better transfer heat from one to the other and end up at closer temps; with space between cells, air flow, convection currents or whatever, introduce more opportunities for ... differential heat transfer...
On the subject of pack cooling...

In the Insight battery space, would it be better for pack performance and longevity to have cells packed closely so each cell is more likely to be the same temperature, or packed with space for presumably more air flow between cells, better cooling, yet perhaps risk having cells at more varied temps?
We may have our answer in the HCH2. The 06-08 with it's much tighter spaced sticks and offset/nested spacing is the second worst pack ever made with a 1 in 6 failure rate in 5-7 years. The 09-11 increased the spacing slightly. Worst pack ever made with a 1 in 3 failure rate in 3-4 years.

Both have substantially more cooling capability due to an absurdly powerful blower that is literally as effective as a leaf blower and consumes about 100W. I messed my kid's hair up from 10' away when I aimed it at him. "DAD! STOP IT!"

It may be an unfair comparison because I'm pretty sure those are Sanyo and not Panasonic cells (before Panasonic bought Sanyo). They may be less heat tolerant as the Sanyo cells performed wonderfully in the air-conditioned battery of the Ford Escape Hybrid (battery rarely over 100°F).

From an aerodynamics point of view, more spacing and slower flow is better for laminar airflow around a cylinder's surface for maximum heat transfer. In that regard the puny 120mm fan of the Insight might have more potential benefit than the massive blower on the HCH1. However, in this regard, I would expect the HCH2 packs to have better cooling because the flow is deliberately interrupted and diverted through what amount to serpentine passages vs. complete cylinders.

OH THE HUMANITY! SCREW TRYING TO RECONCILE THEORY WITH REAL-WORLD!!!!!!
See less See more
OH THE HUMANITY! SCREW TRYING TO RECONCILE THEORY WITH REAL-WORLD!!!!!!
So did you water cool your pack:D

EDIT: Nvm, not sure how missed the second head exchanger. I thought possibly you ran some kind of cooling into the packs.
81 - 91 of 91 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top