Fred said:
...as the agent was given the keys, the individual was advised that I am very much interested in keeping the high MPG data which the car has...
Thank you Fred for that suggestion - I'll remember it when/if the next time I take one of the Insights in for some work.
Took Wifey's updated red 2006 MT for a 50-mile errand and it returned a respectable round trip in the low 80's despite having to drive faster than usual because of heavy freeway traffic - remembering that I also have a two-mile climb to get home.
Here's my latest
subjective perception comparing our 2002 unupgraded MT (ignoring MIMA, FAS, etc.) with the updated 2006:
1. Mileage achievable about the same
2. Both regen and assist are about the same, even though initially I thought that assist kicked in sooner for the 2006
3. The "lights-on" trick hidden regen does seem to work on the 2006
4. SOC display seems to have a "different" response: unlike my initial drive, now my impression is that the 2006 shows both depletion and recovery faster than the 2002. If I were to hazard a guess, whereas if the 2002 SOC display shows a range of 20%-80% then perhaps the 2006 SOC display shows a range of maybe 20% to 70%. [mod edit]
5. Otherwise, the two cars "feel" absolutely identical - weird, as I've never had two identical cars sound and feel and respond exactly the same.
I'll be signing off now, as I'm putting the Insights up on blocks and going back to cruising next week. Thank you John B. and the other moderators for running a great forum, thanks to all for the wonderful participation as I have learned a tremendous amount from you all.[mod edit]

JoeS.
http://www.katiekat.net