puck wrote:
I haven't taken physics since college ['78 Cornell], but I do remember F=ma [Force = mass * acceleration]. So the less acceleration, the less force, the less fuel used.
The insight complicates this because if the assist kicks in than the fuel used is electric and not fossil, but ii think in the long term it works out.
Also, i like cruise control because it makes me much more predictable to the cars around me. And I find predictability highly correlated with safety.
My understanding is that acceleration uses much more energy than velocity. So, if you accelerate once and maintain it you use less energy than if you re-accellerate to get back to where you were.
I haven't taken physics since college ['78 Cornell], but I do remember F=ma [Force = mass * acceleration]. So the less acceleration, the less force, the less fuel used.
The insight complicates this because if the assist kicks in than the fuel used is electric and not fossil, but ii think in the long term it works out.
Also, i like cruise control because it makes me much more predictable to the cars around me. And I find predictability highly correlated with safety.